3 November 2025

"Three Short Sermons About Zacchaeus"

Two Rivers Pastoral Charge
Sunday November 2, 2025
Scripture:  Luke 19:1-10


Has anyone here ever heard the term “rage-baiting”?  This is a concept in social media, a place where the number of views that a post gets, the number of comments, the number of reactions, is directly related to success.  The more views, the more reactions, the more comments, positive or negative, that a post gets, the more likely the Instagram or Facebook or YouTube or TikTok algorithm is to show it to other people.

And as a result, some people will post a rage-bait video or picture, whose sole purpose it to get people upset and clicking the thumbs-down reaction, or posting a comment to point out what is wrong.  An example of this might be a map with an obvious error that might be a typo but is more likely there to get people to correct it in the comments.  It might be as innocuous as watching a short cooking video and the chef says to add a teaspoon of baking powder but you can clearly see them holding a box of baking soda.  Or it might be as dangerous as posting a controversial conspiracy theory about vaccines that is guaranteed to get people on both sides riled up and arguing in the comments.

So why do creators do this?  Views. Engagement = promotion by the social media algorithm = more views on the post with spillover to more views on their other posts. And for someone trying to make a living out of social media, views and followers = money.

And why do social media companies promote posts and videos with ragebait content?  For the same reason – money.  It doesn’t matter if the reactions and comments are positive or negative to the companies – the more you engage in the content, the more minutes (or hours) you are going to spend on the platform, and the more advertising revenue Facebook or TikTok makes.

So I’ll get you to tuck this ragebait definition in your back pocket – we’re going to come back to it later, I promise!

Let’s turn from social media to the bible, and the story of Zacchaeus that we heard this morning.  Zacchaeus was a tax collector in the city of Jericho, and Jesus was passing through town, along with his disciples, on his way towards Jerusalem.  He wanted to see Jesus, and because he was short, he climbs a tree so that he can get a better look.  Jesus sees him up there, calls out to him by name, and invites himself to Zacchaeus’s house for dinner. And after the meal ends, Zacchaeus promises to give half of his possessions to the poor, and promises that if he cheats anyone out of money, he will repay four times as much as he stole.

At some point in your life, there is a very good chance that at least some of you have heard a preacher stand here and talk to you about tax collectors in Jesus’s world.  Heck, there’s a good chance that I’m the preacher who has stood here and talked to you about tax collectors in Jesus’s world.  The tax collectors tended to be the most despised people of that time and place.  They weren’t Roman; they were local people who were colluding with the Roman empire.  They were given the task of extracting tax money from the local people on behalf of the Roman Empire, and they were especially despised because they weren’t paid very well, and so they had a nasty habit of extracting more money than was owed to Rome and pocketing the difference.

And here we have Zacchaeus, the tax collector.  Not only is he a tax collector but he is the chief tax collector, the ruler of the tax collectors, a prince among tax collectors.  And not just that, but he is rich in a world where most of the population is barely able to keep a roof overhead and food on their plate.  He was someone that would be very easy to despise; and he likely faced a lot of cruelty on top of it all for his physical deformity – he was so short that he had to climb a tree in order to see over the heads of the crowd.

It would be a very easy sermon to preach to say that Zacchaeus had a literal come-to-Jesus moment in this story.  It would be a very easy sermon to preach to say that this grasping, conniving man met Jesus, and just like the Grinch, his shrunken heart grew three sizes that day, and he became a person who was all about generosity, giving away half of his possessions, and repaying four-fold all of the money he had stolen from his neighbours.  Go, and be like Zacchaeus!  End of sermon.

That would be an easy sermon to preach, and whether or not you have heard that sermon before, I know that I have preached that sermon before!

But what if I were to suggest that this sermon might be doing a disservice to Zacchaeus?  What if I were to tell you that if you were to turn back to the original Greek, you would discover that many translations make a mistake?  That the verb tenses aren’t quite what most translations say?  That Zacchaeus didn’t say, “I will give half of my possessions to the poor, and I will pay back four times as much”; but instead he said “I give half of my possessions to the poor, and I repay them four times as much.”  The original Greek isn’t in the future tense, but it is in the present continual tense.

What if Zacchaeus has been doing these things all along?  This isn’t a Come-to-Jesus moment after all, a dramatic conversion on the Road to Jericho.  What, then, is Jesus trying to teach with this encounter?

Which brings me back to my definition of ragebait.  What if Jesus is ragebaiting the crowd?  Nothing will grab the attention of the crowd, get them riled up more than seeing Jesus hanging out with the person that they feel is least deserving of his attention.  A rich man.  The leader of the despised tax collectors.  A short man who is easy to mock.

Luke puts it quite mildly when he says that the crowd began to grumble when they saw Jesus hanging out with the one they hated.  I rather suspect that the grumbling was more than just a low rumble.  I can imagine the odd shout coming from the crowd – “Hey Jesus, you don’t want to have anything to do with that short little Tax Collector!” or “Of course Zacchaeus who gets everything he wants gets time with Jesus too.”  Maybe someone had an especially ripe tomato on hand that gets tossed in their direction, hitting Zacchaeus squarely in the back and splattering some juice on Jesus’s robe.

Jesus has caught their attention for sure, but why?  Unlike 21st Century ragebaiters, there isn’t any financial gain for Jesus to do so, but like on Social Media, he now has the crowd’s attention.  And his decision to dine with Zacchaeus is very much in keeping with his overall message – that God has special concern and special love for anyone who is marginalized.  It doesn’t matter if you are marginalized because you have leprosy or because you are possessed by demons or because you are a tax collector – God loves you.

So this might be a sermon, not on conversion and Come-to-Jesus moments, but rather on God’s radical inclusivity of the very people that society casts out.  Love your neighbour, especially your marginalized neighbour. Be like Jesus.  End of sermon.

But I want to pivot one more time, and suggest that there might still be a sermon in here with that original message, Go, be like Zacchaeus.

Zacchaeus was trapped in a broken and corrupt system – a system of Empire, where the land he was born into was the property of Rome, and where a foreign emperor controlled every aspect of life.  He was born into a family that had profited from historical inequality and they had wealth, likely acquired on the backs of other people.  He was employed by a system where corruption was the norm – we aren’t told how he ended up in this job, but possibly his family made their wealth because his father and grandfather were tax collectors before him.

And yet despite all of this, as he was trying to live and exist in a world full of unjust and broken systems, Zacchaeus does his best to live his life in a way that honours God and loves his neighbours.  The law said that he was to tithe 1/10 of what he had, and Zacchaeus gives 5 times as much, giving away half of his possessions to the poor.  The law said that if one person cheated another person out of money or property, they were to give back twice as much as they stole, and Zacchaeus doubles the requirement, repaying 4 times as much.

Could it be that Zacchaeus is actually an honourable man, doing his best to do good while living in a corrupt world; and Jesus is challenging us to see past our prejudices in order to see him in this light?

If the message is to “Go and be like Zacchaeus,” it is very easy to name the unfair and broken systems that we are trapped by.  We are trapped living in an economic system that allows a small number of people to get obscenely rich while the gap between the rich and the poor is always growing.  We are trapped living in a system that is dependent on fossil fuels, as our planet is literally on fire as a result.  We are trapped living in a world where historical injustices mean that those of us with white skin receive benefits we didn’t earn while our black and Indigenous neighbours live with disadvantages that they don’t deserve.

We are living, like Zacchaeus, trapped in systems that we, individually, don’t have the power to change.  So the question is, how can we, like Zacchaeus, live our lives in this broken world in a way that honours God and loves our neighbours?

Go and be like Zacchaeus.  End of sermon.  (For real, this time!)

 

 

“Zacchaeus” by Cara B. Hochhalter

Image Used with Permission

No comments:

Post a Comment