Two
Rivers Pastoral Charge
Sunday November 24, 2024 – Reign of Christ Sunday
Scripture: John 18:33-37
I want to invite you to imagine that you are sitting in church… well, I guess
that part doesn’t take too much imagination!... but I want to invite you to
imagine that the church you are sitting in is located in Germany, and it is
November 1933. Adolf Hitler was
appointed Chancellor in January of this year, and one of his projects was
aligning the German church with the values of the Nazi party, including
anti-semitism, racism, and placing the word and authority of the Fürher – ie
Hitler – above all other authorities.
In the months since January, the leadership in the Protestant churches – whether they be presbyteries or bishops – has been replaced by people in line with the values of the Nazi party. Any clergy who had Jewish ancestry have been defrocked, as have any clergy married to someone with non-Aryan roots. There are calls to remove any Jewish elements in the bible, including, from some quarters, removing the entire Old Testament.
What do we do as a church? In the 15 years since the last war ended (which our country lost), there has been a groundswell of German nationalism. We are always being told that Germany is the best country, that Germans are the best people, that God loves us most of all, and that German Christians are the best kind of Christians. And because of this, doesn’t it make sense that the Christian German Chancellor should be the supreme authority of the church, maybe not just in Germany but elsewhere too? Who doesn’t want to hear that we are winning, both as a people and as a church?
What do we do? The easiest thing is to go along with it. Not only does our government promote this way of thinking, but all of our new church leaders are in agreement with it, and are enforcing it through the hierarchical structures of the church. And since the world outside of the church is rallying around chants of “Make Germany great again!” and “A German Church for the German People!” this is the only way that we will survive in a world of turmoil.
But there were some German pastors who didn’t agree with going along. They didn’t agree with the nationalistic fervor that was invading the church. They had a different understanding of what the church was, and what the church was supposed to be. And so between May 29 and May 31, 1934, 139 delegates from different Protestant churches, a mixture of ministers and lay church members and university professors, gathered in the town of Barmen and worked around the clock to draft a theological statement to stand against the German churches’ acquiescence to and acceptance of National Socialism or Nazism.
At the end of the third day, they had written and signed a document that begins: “Jesus Christ, as he is attested to us in Holy Scripture, is the one Word of God whom we have to hear, and whom we have to trust and obey in life and in death”; and went on to include politically radical statements like: “We reject the false doctrine that there could be areas of our life in which we would not belong to Jesus Christ but to other lords,” and “We reject the false doctrine that the Church could, and could have permission to, give itself or allow itself to be given special leaders [cough… Hitler] vested with ruling authority.”
This radical statement, that proclaimed that since Jesus Christ was the one true head of the church, therefore no human being could ever fill that role, came to be known as the Barmen Declaration. It was inflammatory in the political state of Germany in the 1930s. It led to the formation of a new denomination, known as the Confessing Church – ie the church that confessed the ultimate authority of God in Jesus Christ, rather than the ultimate authority of the Chancellor. But many of the people who signed the Barmen Declaration ended up imprisoned for their opposition to the Nazi government, and some of them were executed for it. And though a new denomination formed as a result, this declaration didn’t sway the opinion of the majority of churches in Germany, or the majority of Christians. The majority of churches accepted the authority of Hitler over the church and over their lives. Maybe this was the easier road. Maybe this was the safer road. Maybe they believed in the message of German superiority.
But in the almost-century since, we have come to recognize which churches made the right choice. At least, I hope that we have come to recognize this.
Which brings us to our bible story today. We’ve jumped to the very end of Jesus’s life – we’re in the middle of the Good Friday story here, and Jesus is on trial before Pontius Pilate, the Roman governor. We are in Pilate’s palace in Jerusalem, surrounded by the opulence of the Roman Empire.
As we observe this scene, we are presented with two options, two paths that we can follow. We can put our trust in the power of Rome, the power of Empire, as represented by Pilate. This would be the way of worldly power, of comfort and luxury, of security (as long as you’re willing to tow the party line).
The other path that is presented to us is the path of Jesus. Now this is a radically different path than the one that Pilate offers us. Jesus has been saying some pretty challenging things on the way into Jerusalem – things like “the greatest commandment is to love God, to love others, and to love ourselves.” Things like, “To be greatest, you must be the servant to all.” Things like, “Let the most vulnerable come to me, for it is to ones like them that belongs the kingdom of God.” Things like, “The first are last, and the last are first.” Things like, “I’m going to walk this valley of suffering before you have to.” And the way of Jesus eventually ends up on the cross.
And so in this scene that the Gospel of John paints for us, we are in Pilate’s palace, looking at two kings, and being asked to choose which king we are going to put our trust in. Are we going to trust in the king of worldly power, the king of Empire? Or are we going to trust in the king of the cross?
Before ending off, I want to paint one more scene to add to Barmen 1934 and Pilate’s palace circa AD 33. And that third scene is the church in Canada in 2024. Because I think that the foundational question we have to ask ourselves today is the same question as it is in those previous scenes. Which king are we going to choose to put our trust in?
I don’t know if the urgency is as close to the surface today as it is in the two previous scenes, but I do think that it is something that we have to consider. What are the things in our world today that might lure us away from the way of Jesus, from the way of the cross? Because I think that there are things that would lure us away. The way of Jesus isn’t an easy way. It is the way of service to others even if, especially if we don’t think that they “deserve it.” It is the way of extending forgiveness to people who have wronged and hurt us. It is the way of giving up control over our own lives and destiny. Certainly there are far easier paths that we could choose to travel.
And when the rubber hits the road, where are we going to ultimately put our trust? Do we trust in the king of Empire, or do we trust in the king of the Cross?
And yet the way of Jesus, the way of the Cross is also the way where we receive forgiveness just as we are called to extend forgiveness. It is the way where we receive unconditional love, just as we are called to extend unconditional love. It is the way where, even as we give up control, we are giving control over to the one whose yoke is easy and whose burden is light.
Let me end with some words that I shared earlier this week – words that come from the now-inactive Facebook account, Occupy Advent. They wrote:
If Jesus is Lord, then nothing else can be.
If Jesus is Lord, then violence and anger are not.
If Jesus is Lord, then the nation is not.
If Jesus is Lord, then my stuff is not.
If Jesus is Lord, then I certainly am not.
If Jesus is Lord, then ______ is not.
Which king are you going to choose?
Die Barmer Theologische Erklärung
The Barmen Theological Declaration
Photo Credit: Shawn Harmon